United Russia | The ‘party of power’

The Hindu – International

You are logged in

Loading…

You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.

Your active subscription(s)

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials,
Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

Products you’ve access to

Additional Subscription Benefits

Account Settings

Need help with your subscription?

Weather News September 26, 2026 e-Paper

The View From India
Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show
News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache
Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Science For All
The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!

Data Point
Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

THEdge
At the cutting edge of education and careers

Health Matters
Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

Gender Agenda
Stories from beyond the binary.

The Hindu On Books
Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

Weather News September 26, 2026 e-Paper

Published – September 27, 2026 01:01 am IST

Russians waving national flags while waiting for results in Manezhnaya square, near the Kremlin in Moscow.
| Photo Credit: AP

Often during his international engagements, the one question that infuriates Russian President Vladimir Putin the most is if Russia is a “managed democracy”. He has been vehement in saying it’s not. “The road to democracy must be adapted to the realities of Russian life, traditions, and history,” Mr. Putin said in February 2005 at a press conference after the Bratislava Summit, attended also by the then U.S. President, George W. Bush.

But, despite his protestations, democracy in Russia is under intense scrutiny. Mr. Putin’s party, United Russia, is the big bear that wins almost all elections in Russia. In the just-concluded parliamentary elections, United Russia got 349 out of the 450 seats in the Duma, polling 58% of the vote for the 225 seats apportioned by parties and winning 209 single-seat races that fill the other half of the lower chamber of Parliament. The vote, western observers said, was flawed. In August, Russia’s Supreme Court barred Yabloko, the only party running on an anti-war platform, from appearing on the ballot, as polls showed it gaining in popularity and possibly poised to win enough votes to enter Parliament.

The 2024 Presidential election was no different. The result of Russia’s March 15-17 election was known to everyone even before the first ballot was cast, The Hindu noted in its editorial, as Mr. Putin won nearly 88% of the vote. The country saw a record turnout of 77.44%, and the results showed that Russia “is united” under the long-time leader, Ella Pamfilova, Election Commission chief, said. Only Kremlin-tolerated candidates, meaning those who could not challenge Mr. Putin and United Russia, were allowed to contest.

United Russia, called varyingly as the “party of power” or, for its nebulous ideology, the “big-tent” party, is the Kremlin party, and it’s debatable if the party wants to keep Mr. Putin in power or if it’s the other way. In December 2001, Mr. Putin’s Unity party and Fatherland-All Russia, a leading Opposition group, merged to form an entity which became United Russia in 2003, in time for the Parliament elections. Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov, one of Mr. Putin’s fiercest political enemies and strongest potential rivals for the presidency, announced that he and his bloc would side with Unity, which was founded in 1999 by Kremlin strategists to take on Fatherland.

As Acting President after Boris Yeltsin resigned six months before the end of his term on January 1, 2000 and handed over power to him, Mr. Putin, who was Prime Minister before being elevated, went on to consolidate his grip on the state. “Russian democracy now speaks with but one voice. Just 18 months ago, leaders of five ideological factions were waging a pitched public battle to succeed Mr. Yeltsin. Now there is only Mr. Putin, a man of no classifiable ideology beyond building a strong Russia, his rule endorsed by three of every four Russians, according to polls,” the New York Times reported on January 21, 2001, after Mr. Putin won the presidency in an election. A few days later, Parliament introduced a Bill that would drastically reduce the number of registered parties from 57 to just about six.

The news agency Tass, owned by the Russian government, says United Russia “promotes centrist and conservative ideas, stands for strengthening the country’s sovereignty, increasing its defence capabilities, advancing the patriotic education of young people, enhancing investment, introducing innovative technologies, developing democracy and civil society institutions”. In the 2017 article, Tass reported that the party had two million members.

Under Mr. Putin and United Russia, statism, rooted in Orthodox Christian conservative values, replaced the state-sanctioned communism of the Soviet years, The Hindu editorial noted. They mastered a complex model of a tightly held state with regular elections and little dissent. Party leaders varyingly call it centrist and conservative, and Russian conservative. Researchers term it Russian integralism, Eurasianism, and even Putinism. Opposition leaders call United Russia a “party of crooks and thieves”, a phrase popularised by Alexei Navalny, an anti-corruption activist who died in prison.

Gleb Pavlovsky, Putin’s adviser-turned-critic, is considered the chief architect of the “managed democracy” system in Russia. Vladislav Surkov, former Putin aide, called the “grey cardinal” of the Kremlin, rebranded it as “sovereign democracy”. The Economist described him as the architect of “a system of make-believe”, involving imitation political parties, stage-managed media, and orchestrated social movements. Mr. Putin, however, is in denial in public.

Published – September 27, 2026 01:01 am IST

Russia

/

election

/

politics (general)

/

The Hindu Profiles

Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

Fonte: The Hindu – International