Supreme Court stays out of custody battle between California couple and surrogate
Por Anna Wilder and Lindsay Whitehurst — – World RSS Feed
Supreme Court stays out of custody battle between California couple and surrogate
The five-week-old child was born in Texas after a surrogate refused a California couple’s wishes to have an abortion
Anna Wilder & Lindsay Whitehurst Wednesday 23 September 2026 12:07 BST
- Bookmark
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks
Close popover
Become an Independent member to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today.
Already a member?
Log in
Your support helps us to tell the story
Read more Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference. Read more
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to intervene in a custody dispute over a five-week-old child who was born in Texas after a surrogate refused a California couple’s wishes to have an abortion.
Justice Elena Kagan, who handles appeals of cases out of California, denied the request from McKenna West, who was seeking conservatorship over a baby boy she gave birth to in Dallas.
The brief order did not detail the legal reasoning, as is typical in emergency appeals.
West had previously been rejected by other courts in her efforts to have a say in the treatment of the child, who was born with a life-threatening heart condition.
She gave birth to the boy in Dallas, where most abortions are banned, after she refused the couple’s wishes to end the pregnancy.
West had asked the Supreme Court to halt a California court order that recognizes Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar as the parents of the child whom she calls Gabriel, and they call Rumi.
Lawyers for the couple had urged the court to reject the request, questioning what an intervention would do for medical decision-making at an already chaotic time. They also accused West of overstating the prognosis for children born with the heart condition.
“Such chaos would be devastating for Respondents and, most importantly, their child,” the couple told the court.
The legal battle over surrogacy and abortion has attracted the attention and support of Republican officeholders and anti-abortion groups. West has said she believes the couple will not provide life-saving care, citing their request for an abortion at 23 weeks. Gilkar and Ahmed have denied those claims.
The boy was born August 12 with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a life-threatening condition that prevents normal blood flow to the organ. He underwent surgery soon after he was born.
The couple’s attorney said in August that the newborn had been in critical condition and appeared to be “suffering from potential complications.”
Without treatment, children affected by the heart defect can die within days or weeks. Surgical repairs are not necessarily cures, and additional surgeries or heart transplants may be needed, according to the CDC.
More about
CaliforniaDallasWashingtonTexasCDC
Most popular
Popular videos
Bulletin
Read next
Fonte: – World RSS Feed
