US says Australia’s proposed law to opt out of social media algorithm is ‘censorship’
Por Vishwam Sankaran — – World RSS Feed
US says Australia’s proposed law to opt out of social media algorithm is ‘censorship’
Changes applied to algorithms may impact users globally, US says
Vishwam Sankaran Wednesday 23 September 2026 00:39 EDT
- Bookmark
- Comments Go to comments
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks
Close popover
Your support helps us to tell the story
Read more Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference. Read more
The US embassy in Canberra has raised “serious concerns” over Australia’s proposed laws that would give its social media users the choice to opt out of Big Tech algorithms, calling it “censorship of protected speech”.
A draft bill for the “My Feed, My Way” initiative was released by the Anthony Albanese government earlier this month, and it is expected to be introduced in Australia’s parliament after the consultation period.
Under the proposed law, Big Tech firms risk hefty fines of around $72m (A$100m) if they do not provide Australia’s over 21 million social media users the choice to opt out of online platform algorithms via pop-up messages.
The Australian government reasoned that the proposed rules would give users the option to make their social media feeds feature only content from accounts they follow, curbing people’s exposure to harmful content online.
open image in galleryBut in a rare submission to the proposed laws, the US government said it has “serious concerns about the Australian government’s stated goal”.
“We are particularly concerned by potential mandates that would allow regulators to impose rigid, one-size-fits-all platform design requirements – such as forced chronological feeds or opt-in recommendation systems,” the US government said in its submission.
It said the framework’s “vague definitions of ‘harm’” risks becoming a mechanism for “viewpoint-based censorship” that could also affect users outside of Australia.
The White House had previously flagged that such measures could impose unfair restrictions on US-based tech companies.
“Mandated platform design features, especially when applied to algorithms, may affect what users see, say, and hear not just in or from Australia, but globally,” the US government said.
“We ask that Australia clarify how exactly ‘harm’ and ‘risks’ shall be determined, if there are any standard definitions that will be utilised, and by whom in the context of the proposed plans, ensuring these definitions do not encroach on protected speech,” it said.
open image in galleryThe proposed laws, according to the US, may also risk “reducing the reach of independent journalists or other voices whose content touches on sensitive or controversial topics”.
Under the proposed laws, if platforms are forced to filter content “to satisfy a government mandate and such filtering draws in protected speech, the effect on a disfavoured speaker or media source’s reach would not be meaningfully different than outright removal,” the US said.
“The US government would likely consider such a measure as facilitating censorship,” it said, adding that it could also “affect Australia’s reputation as a jurisdiction that enables innovation”.
The submission comes amid the Australian prime minister’s US visit to speak at the UN General Assembly.
Mr Albanese defended his government’s proposed laws, stating he would “always stand up for Australian interests”.
Speaking to journalists in New York, he said the proposed move is “not about giving government control”.
“It’s about giving people back control over what they receive on their devices,” he said, adding that his administration would “engage constructively” before finalising the legislation.
More about
AustraliaAnthony AlbaneseBig TechUN General AssemblyWhite House
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Most popular
Popular videos
Bulletin
Read next
Fonte: – World RSS Feed
