Ganga Water Treaty is ‘flawed’, needs to be updated: Bangladesh river expert
The Hindu – International
You are logged in
Loading…
You don’t have any Active Subscription.
Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one.
Your active subscription(s)
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials,
Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
Products you’ve access to
Additional Subscription Benefits
Account Settings
Need help with your subscription?
Weather News October 6, 2026 e-Paper
The View From India
Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show
News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache
Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Science For All
The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in!
Data Point
Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
THEdge
At the cutting edge of education and careers
Health Matters
Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
Gender Agenda
Stories from beyond the binary.
The Hindu On Books
Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
Weather News October 6, 2026 e-Paper
Published – October 06, 2026 10:49 pm IST – DHAKA
India always looks at the Ganga treaty as a bilateral treaty but in the lean months it receives a lot of snowmelt from Nepal’s Ghaghara, Gandaki, and Koshi rivers; they also need to be monitored if we have to care for the Ganga,” Mr. Chowdhury said. Image for representation only
| Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
DHAKA
The 1996 India-Bangladesh Ganga Water Treaty is “flawed” as it lacks a guarantee clause and does not account for factors like climate change impact, a leading Bangladesh river water expert has said. Speaking to The Hindu on Tuesday (October 6, 2026), Manjur A. Chowdhury, former Chairman of the National River Conservation Commission (NRCC) of Bangladesh said the Treaty will expire in December and should be replaced by a short-term treaty of three years. This should be followed by a better researched trilateral treaty that also brings in Nepal since that nation’s rivers carry Himalayan snowmelt to the Ganga.
“The Ganga Water Treaty is three decades old and flawed as it does not include a guarantee clause. It also does not have ecological flow and environmental flow considerations. In addition, the treaty does not include factors that are related to climate change. It simply divides the water of the river. That is not a right approach,” said Mr. Chowdhury who believes that the Ganga Water Treaty should include Nepal. A good treaty, he added, should take into account the “health of the river” so that the Ganga is not overexploited.
“Before the treaty’s expiry in December this year, ideally, we should opt for a short-term treaty of three years during which time we will conduct further research and negotiations to draft a new and lasting Ganga Water Treaty that will incorporate technological and environmental developments,” said Mr. Chowdhury, speaking exclusively to The Hindu.
“India always looks at the Ganga treaty as a bilateral treaty but in the lean months it receives a lot of snowmelt from Nepal’s Ghaghara, Gandaki, and Koshi rivers; they also need to be monitored if we have to care for the Ganga,” Mr. Chowdhury said. He argued that the Ganga water treaty requires a fresh approach as environmental factors of the twenty-first century will have to be considered while drafting the text of the treaty. His comments came a day after he made similar remarks at a conclave in Dhaka calling for a fresh treaty. The Ganga Water Treaty will expire in December this year unless the two sides agree to renew the treaty for another three decades.
Earlier, former Foreign Secretary Farooq Sobhan, who had negotiated the treaty during the first prime ministerial tenure of Sheikh Hasina in 1996 said that the absence of an arbitration clause is a problem for the treaty. Speaking with The Hindu, Mr. Sobhan further said that there are unfulfilled Indian promises related to the Ganga Water Treaty that will have to be revisited. “India had promised to build a barrage for Padma (Ganga) in Bangladeshi territory at that time, but it was not followed up. That was the quid pro quo for not including the arbitration clause. But that barrage was not built,” said Mr. Sobhan. He added that Bangladesh carried out surveys in the 1990s regarding the building of a barrage but did not receive the help it needed. Discussions on the renewal of the Ganga Water Treaty have been ongoing in both India and Bangladesh though important technical consultations are yet to be held ahead of the expiry in December this year. Earlier JD(U) MP Sanjay Jha had called on the Government of India not to renew the Ganga Water Treaty saying that the treaty with Bangladesh had “negatively impacted” Bihar.
Subsequently, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had written to Mr. Jha on August 28, “We fully understand your concerns regarding the Ganga Water Treaty. I would like to bring to your attention that under the leadership of the Jal Shakti Ministry, inter-ministerial consultation involving relevant stakeholders have taken place to ensure broad-based consultation on the future of the treaty.”
(The Correspondent was in Dhaka as the guest of Centre for Governance Studies (CGS) to participate in the Bay of Bengal Conversation.)
Published – October 06, 2026 10:49 pm IST
Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
BACK TO TOP
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.
Fonte: The Hindu – International
