DA in Cornell rape investigation declined to review some evidence, including interviews

0

Por Erin Keller — – World RSS Feed

  1. News
  2. World
  3. Americas
  4. US Crime News

DA in Cornell rape investigation declined to review some evidence, including interviews

Prosecutors agreed not to pursue criminal charges based on Jane Doe’s six-page statement

Erin Keller In Ohio Saturday 03 October 2026 13:04 EDT

  • Bookmark

Bookmark popover

Removed from bookmarks

Close popover

Newly obtained documents say the D.A. declined to review additional evidence in the Cornell rape investigation, while the office tells The Independent that the cited interviews were simply suspects refusing to speak on their lawyers’ advice open image in gallery
Newly obtained documents say the D.A. declined to review additional evidence in the Cornell rape investigation, while the office tells The Independent that the cited interviews were simply suspects refusing to speak on their lawyers’ advice ( AFP/Getty )

Independent Membership

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article

Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today.

Join today

Already a member?
Log in

Evening Headlines

The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday

Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US

Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US

Evening Headlines

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice

A New York district attorney declined to review additional evidence gathered by Cornell University police before deciding not to pursue criminal charges in a gang rape investigation, according to newly obtained records.

The records, obtained by the New York Times, show that on November 25, 2024, a Cornell investigator told a member of the Tompkins County district attorney’s office that campus police had conducted additional interviews. Prosecutors did not ask to review the evidence and instead agreed that, based on a six-page statement from the former student known as Jane Doe, “criminal charges would not be pursued in this case.”

But before prosecutors declined to pursue charges, Cornell police had conducted interviews, reviewed messages, logged tips and contacted people connected to the case. The investigation continued through January 2025, but prosecutors did not review the additional evidence, a decision not previously reported, according to The Times.

The case stems from a civil lawsuit filed last month by Jane Doe, who alleges she was drugged and gang-raped by seven Chi Phi fraternity members in October 2024. All of the men have denied wrongdoing, and none has been charged.

A spokesperson for the Tompkins County D.A.’s Office pushed back on The Times’ report in a statement to The Independent Saturday, saying: “The ‘interviews’ being cited were essentially each of the seven suspects telling the police that they would not speak to them on the advice of counsel.”

Newly obtained documents say the D.A. declined to review additional evidence in the Cornell rape investigation, while the office tells The Independent that the cited interviews were simply suspects refusing to speak on their lawyers’ advice open image in gallery
Newly obtained documents say the D.A. declined to review additional evidence in the Cornell rape investigation, while the office tells The Independent that the cited interviews were simply suspects refusing to speak on their lawyers’ advice ( AFP/Getty )

The handling of the case is now under renewed scrutiny and criticism that has made national headlines. On Friday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul criticized Cornell police and the district attorney before appointing Attorney General Letitia James as a special prosecutor with the authority to bring criminal charges.

Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten reportedly told The Times Thursday that additional records gathered by Cornell police were “not pertinent to our analysis because we had Jane Doe’s comprehensive account of the events.”

Van Houten has defended his decision not to prosecute, saying Jane Doe’s police statement “described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious and consensual.” The statement did not establish a crime under New York law, he claimed.

Former prosecutors and legal experts have questioned the decision to rely primarily on the campus police investigation.

“We would never rely on a campus police investigation,” Rick Trunfio, a former upstate New York sex crimes prosecutor and Syracuse University law professor, told The Times. “There are too many problems with that.”

Former prosecutors and legal experts questioned the decision to rely primarily on Cornell’s campus police investigation, with one saying, ‘We would never rely on a campus police investigation’ open image in gallery
Former prosecutors and legal experts questioned the decision to rely primarily on Cornell’s campus police investigation, with one saying, ‘We would never rely on a campus police investigation’ ( Reuters )

Trunfio said the case should have been handled by a specialized police or prosecution team.

“You think Cornell University wants to report something like that?” he added.

A Cornell representative who speaks for campus police declined The Times’ request for comment, citing pending litigation.

The Independent has contacted Cornell for comment.

More about

Cornell Universityjane doerapeIvy League

Most popular

    Popular videos

      Bulletin

        Read next

          Fonte: – World RSS Feed

          Deixe um comentário

          O seu endereço de email não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios marcados com *