Por Ben Geman — Axios

A sweeping bipartisan deal to cut permitting red tape faces a long road ahead despite a broad show of support.

Why it matters: Cutting hurdles for energy projects is a top priority for fossil fuels and renewables sectors, but some green groups fear erosion of safeguards.

  • Powerful business groups want to make building all sorts of infrastructure easier.

Driving the news: Top Republicans and Democrats on the Senate’s energy and environment panels on Wednesday dropped the 417-page bill that includes:

  • New limits on the duration of lawsuits, and the scope and length of reviews under the Clean Water Act and National Environmental Policy Act.
  • A stronger federal hand in siting and approval of large transmission projects.
  • Protections for previously issued permits, a priority for renewables groups and Dems upset with Trump administration barriers.

The big picture: A who’s who of major business and energy industry groups — representing oil and gas, renewables and coal — cheered the bill.

  • The White House backs the deal and wants quick passage, an official said.

State of play: The deal still has a long road ahead. Co-author Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said Wednesday at a press conference that there will be revisions as backers seek input from colleagues.

  • There are also “unresolved” questions about Trump officials returning to “regular order” for wind and solar projects, Whitehouse said.
  • But he credited the administration with a “very reasonable opening proposal” on the matter.
  • Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee, criticized the bill and said his party will have a stronger hand next year.

Center-left backers see a huge opening to help build out clean energy and grid upgrades to integrate it.

  • But groups on the left flank of the climate movement panned it, calling it a giveaway to fossil fuel interests.

What we’re watching: Some groups with close ties to Democrats staked out a noncommittal-to-positive position, saying they need more time to study the bill.

  • The Natural Resources Defense Council cheered transmission pieces while saying it’s unclear if they outweigh “rollbacks” of environmental laws, and said it “must improve.”
  • Evergreen Action welcomed project certainty and transmission sections but added that changes to key environmental laws demand “diligent scrutiny.”

Zoom in: The bill would prevent utility ratepayers from bearing the costs of new power and grid upgrades needed for AI data centers.

  • Everyone’s still digesting the intricate bill, but in principle, turning this bipartisan goal into firm requirements could ease political hurdles.

The bottom line: Two things are true — the odds of a big permitting deal are at their highest in a very long time, and many things could trip this up.

Sign up here for Axios’ Future of Energy newsletter.

Fonte: Axios

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de email não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios marcados com *