Supreme Court opens the door for Trump’s mass voter purges — but not before midterms, experts say
Por Alex Woodward — – World RSS Feed
Supreme Court opens the door for Trump’s mass voter purges — but not before midterms, experts say
It’s too late for any changes before November, but critics fear an unreliable database could put millions of Americans at risk
Alex Woodward in New York Friday 25 September 2026 22:42 BST
- Bookmark
- Comments Go to comments
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks
Close popover
Become an Independent member to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today.
Already a member?
Log in
Your support helps us to tell the story
Read more Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference. Read more
The Supreme Court will let Donald Trump’s administration implement an expansive government database that collects citizenship data, Social Security numbers and other sensitive information for millions of Americans, a powerful tool that federal agencies and state officials could use to hunt for ineligible voters.
Voting rights groups fear that the database could be used to wrongfully purge eligible voters without an opportunity to correct mistakes, opening the door for unnecessary confusion and illegal disenfranchisement.
The high court’s ruling will likely not have any significant impact on this year’s midterm elections; justices stressed that the administration must comply with the National Voter Registration Act, which bars any major changes to registration rules within 90 days of a federal election.
“Today’s Supreme Court order is a serious blow to voter privacy and civil rights, but it changes nothing about what the law requires before the midterms,” said Tim Harper with the Center for Democracy & Technology.
Still, voting rights advocates and elections experts fear that the conservative majority court has opened the door for the administration to put millions of Americans at risk of being unlawfully targeted by the administration’s unreliable database.
open image in galleryA federal judge had previously blocked use of the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, or SAVE, arguing that it likely violated Americans’ privacy rights and could end up wrongly removing eligible voters from state databases.
Homeland Security has even admitted that the data isn’t perfect, and analysts have uncovered numerous significant errors, including incorrectly flagging recently naturalized citizens as noncitizens who are ineligible to vote.
“While states are prohibited from conducting mass removals during the current statutory 90-day ‘quiet period,’ they should exercise extreme caution with any use of this database,” Verified Voting president Pamela Smith said.
“Now more than ever, voters must check their registration well in advance of Election Day to ensure they are not swept up in a flawed system through no fault of their own,” she said Friday.
States are not currently required to use the SAVE system, and it’s unclear whether there’s an appetite for an unwieldy and unreliable database within a critical period before national elections with no room for error.
“This decision will not have any significant impact on the 2026 election, as systematic voter list maintenance is prohibited within 90 days of a federal election, which the Supreme Court explicitly confirmed,” said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research.
“The most important thing for voters to know is that they will continue to experience the same safe, secure, and reliable voting process in 2026 that they have in past elections,” he said.
open image in galleryFriday’s emergency ruling was unsigned, but the court’s three liberal justices joined a 12-page dissent that warned that any program that disenfranchises “even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.”
The decision is a victory for Trump after a series of losses at the high court, including in his attempts to overhaul election administration — efforts that dovetail with his government-wide anti-immigration campaign.
The administration has justified the citizenship database as part of an ongoing effort to identify noncitizen voters, fueled by the president’s baseless claims that millions of ineligible voters have cast ballots against him.
But critics argue that the database puts the burden of protecting the right to vote on voters themselves, forcing new citizens and other people who would be wrongfully removed to prove they belong.
Jacqueline De León, senior staff attorney with the Native American Rights Fund, argued that the SAVE tool won’t have any “meaningful” impact on removing ineligible voters from rolls but could end up having “a devastating impact on removing voters who are indeed eligible to vote.”
“At the very least, it will sow confusion among voters nationwide, which may be part of its intended purpose,” she said Friday.
“SAVE was never designed to verify citizenship: it relies on outdated and inaccurate data that produces false matches, risks disenfranchising eligible voters, and exposes sensitive personal information to misuse and bad actors,” added Harper with the Center for Democracy & Technology.
“To be clear: claims that SAVE has uncovered widespread noncitizen voting or proven fraud in past elections are not supported by the evidence,” he said. “Noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare, and states already maintain their rolls through more accurate and privacy-protective methods.”
James Percival, general counsel for Homeland Security, appeared to celebrate the court’s ruling. “Yes, you read that right. We had to file an emergency petition in the Supreme Court just so we could use government data to help states stop noncitizens from illegally voting,” he wrote on X.
More about
Supreme CourtDonald TrumpDepartment of Homeland Securitymidtermsvoter suppression
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Most popular
Popular videos
Bulletin
Read next
Fonte: – World RSS Feed
